Peter Dizikes: Writings on Science and Society

Outside the Box
Does innovative lab architecture lead to more innovative science?
By Peter Dizikes. The Boston Globe, May 9, 2004
» Read this article in PDF format

Frank Gehry's new MIT laboratory, the Ray and Maria Stata Center

Science is a dizzyingly diverse enterprise. The buildings that house scientists, however, have long been numbingly uniform. Picture a laboratory. You are probably envisioning one of the regular, modern, rectangular boxes plunked down on university campuses and research parks across America since World War II.

To the delight of many architects and scientists, however, the lab-in-a-box is losing favor. In recent years, more science buildings have begun to feature flexible work spaces, large common areas, fancy atriums, irregular shapes, and other relative extravagances once unseen in the workaday laboratory.

These changes are not just ornamental. Increasingly, they come from the drawing boards of architects who have been pondering how scientists think and work. Some architects have even reached a conclusion not always present in the history of lab design: Scientists are not just cogs in a research machine, but highly creative—and highly social—thinkers.

“It’s not a directive on the part of the designer,” says the New York-based architect Rafael Vinoly, who has recently designed several high-profile and innovative laboratories. “It’s really just a response to the hidden requests of people all over the world, who have been tortured by buildings that have not really changed in 50 years.”

With last week’s opening of Frank Gehry’s new MIT laboratory, the Ray and Maria Stata Center, Boston-area residents have the chance to see a shiny new example of this trend for themselves, courtesy of the world’s best-known architect. Still, Gehry’s energetic (if still unfinished) sprawl of tilting towers, cylinders and blocks raises an unanswered question: Does innovative architecture really help produce innovative science?

Read more


Pharmacy Mall
Features and Profiles
Essays, Reviews, and Misc
All Posted Articles
Bio and Contact Info
RSS for Articles


My work has appeared in The New York Times, The Boston Globe, The Washington Post, Slate, Salon, Technology Review, and numerous other publications. You can learn more about me here.


E. Coli and You
The New York Times, June 29, 2008

The Meaning of the Butterfly
The Boston Globe, June 8, 2008

Joseph Needham's Grand Question
Seed, May/June 2008

Pure Science
The New York Times, April 13, 2008

Nature Nurtures Learning
The Boston Globe, December 31, 2007

Genes Open New Frontier in Privacy Debate
The Boston Globe, September 24, 2007

Cambridge Scientists Put on a Show
Nature Network Boston, May 1, 2007

Edward O. Wilson Sees Accord on Climate Action
The Boston Globe, January 29, 2007

Genome Human
The New York Times, July 30, 2006

Galileo Groupies
Slate, February 3, 2006


Peter Dizikes: Writings on Science and Society


Measure for Measure
Technology Review, July/August 2010


Andrew Hearst


Photo credit: Flickr user alb Marcos, via a Creative Commons license